Tuesday, 6 October 2020

Sabri Lamouchi out, Chris Hughton in: Forest favour change again

18 words is all he got. And half an hour is all we got to mull it over. 

In the end, it's fair to say Sabri Lamouchi was a manager who conducted himself with a great deal more class and dignity than whoever issued the curt and joyless statement announcing his departure from the City Ground. When players who've registered a handful of appearances receive more warmth, it leaves a sour taste and doesn't paint the club in the best light. 

Nor, frankly, does the report in the Athletic of the club owner's apparent actions after the Barnsley League Cup game. These events appear to have undermined the former Rennes boss and really can't have helped to lift spirits at a club still shellshocked by the all-too-recent calamity of the past season's finale.

The popular Frenchman's departure tonight was a sad end to a tenure that offered so much promise. Perhaps his greatest failing was to offer a glimmer of hope that the club's short-term goals might be achievable. Now he's a man who failed to make the seemingly-impossible possible and has paid the price for being unable to reverse the rot once it set in. 

Even those of us who supported him have to accept, however, that one hell of a rot had set in - and it wasn't exactly a surprise to see him go in the end.

Chris Hughton - the best possible choice?

Forest may have been short of words to describe his departure - but the English language is short of words to describe the odd feelings this club has a habit of stirring. It's possible to be both disappointed with a poorly handled sacking and mightily impressed with the calibre of his replacement in one mixed-up bundle. 

Chris Hughton seems like the best possible choice in the circumstances - a smart manager with the experience, cool head and pragmatism needed to try to knit together a side from a squad that contains a fair few experienced heads. He's worked for demanding owners in the past, steered clubs to play-off and promotion campaigns and even (fanciful though it sounds from this far out) established clubs in the top flight after getting up. 

You also feel that his style might well suit the players at his disposal and avoid the need for too many more additions after a window in which 13 new faces have already checked in at the City Ground. A complete change of style - with a need for yet more purchases - wouldn't have been wise.

It's probably a smart tactic to have the new man lined up right away when wielding the axe too - it does at least take the sting out of some of the criticism that might've been levelled at the club hierarchy for its role in the situation we're in.

Don't let the club off the hook

But let's not allow the moment to pass before making this point - the people at the top of the club need to reflect on their failings. They're just as culpable as the man they unceremoniously bundled out of the door and we won't move on unless they learn.

After the disastrous end to last season, the senior leadership had a decision to make - stick or twist. Instead, they tried both. They stuck by the manager in a bid to get some continuity and build on the highest league finish in nine years. They also decided to revamp the squad with the sort of volume of signings and departures you'd expect to have seen if they had actually sacked Sabri. Maybe they hoped to build on the foundations of last season and get a boost from freshening up the dressing room. It feels very much like a 'have your cake and eat it' strategy - and it didn't work. In the end we got the benefit of neither approach - getting simultaneously stuck in a rut and left with a situation in which it'll take some time for a best XI to emerge. Reports will say Sabri was 'backed by the addition of 13 new signings' - but they ought to reflect on the fact that he never really had chance to field some of those more than once, if at all. 

If a limp defeat to Barnsley in a cup competition we could've done without was enough to anger the owner, then perhaps the point of no return had been passed anyway? Throwing players at the problem and hoping something sticks is the sort of short termist folly that the previous regime was famous for. Is that really all we've got? Let's hope not.

Hughton has a great track record, but he could do without him and his players facing a rollicking over Zoom. Evangelos Marinakis might be used to getting his own way, but he has to face up to the fact that he's not in charge of a club that can naturally challenge for honours every season regardless. He can expect results yesterday if he likes, but he won't get them without being a bit smarter than that. I'm sure he knows an awful lot more than me about running a football club, but it's time he showed that he does.

To be fair, in Hughton the club have picked a manager to match their recruitment policy (or part of it anyway) - finding an experienced head who shouldn't need time to adjust to the nature of the league. He seems a popular choice with fans - and a popular figure in the game too. But, as ever with Forest managers, he needs time he doesn't really have to do two seasons work in one. He needs luck as well as skill to find a winning formula quickly. He also needs support - from the owners, the dressing room and us. I hope he gets it.

So, yes, I'm happy with Hughton. And, yes, I'm sad about Sabri. And disappointed with some shoddy communication while at the same time hopeful that things can improve. Like those early era Facebook statuses, with Forest 'it's complicated'.